Your privacy, your choice. Choose whether TheChosenVictor.com may use optional Google Ads measurement or keep advertising storage limited. This website setting does not change the privacy practices of any app.
Put the tradeoffs on one page. Weight what matters, score each option on the same scale, and inspect the contribution behind the ranking.
Your options, criteria, weights, and scores stay in this browser.
Step 01 / Choices
Options
Step 02 / Priorities
Criteria and weights
Step 03 / Evidence
Scores from 1 to 10
Criterion
Option A
Option B
Impact
Method
How it works
01Name two to six options and one to eight criteria.
02Give each criterion a point or percentage weight, then score every option from 1 to 10.
03Calculate the normalized ranking and inspect how each criterion contributed to the total.
04Export a formula-safe CSV, or import the same documented shape later.
Boundaries
Limits
A weighted result makes the assumptions visible. It does not make the decision for you.
Weights must total more than zero, and every option needs a score for every criterion.
The editor holds two to six options and one to eight criteria.
Matrix contents are not saved, placed in the URL, or sent to analytics.
Make tradeoffs explicit
What is a weighted decision matrix?
A shared scoring model
A weighted decision matrix compares the same options against the same criteria. Each criterion gets an importance weight, each option gets a score, and the calculator combines those judgments into a ranked total. The value is not mathematical certainty. It is a visible record of what mattered and how the ranking was produced.
Best for plausible alternatives
Use it for supplier selection, project priorities, product choices, hiring rubrics, or any decision with several credible options and competing factors. If the options are genuinely interchangeable, the random choice picker is the simpler tool.
Transparent scoring
How the weighted score is calculated
The calculator first normalizes every criterion: criterion weight divided by the sum of all weights. It then multiplies each 1-to-10 score by that criterion's normalized weight and adds the contributions. The result stays on the same 1-to-10 scale, which makes options easy to compare even when your raw weights do not add up to 100.
option total = Σ(score × criterion weight ÷ total weight)
A zero weight keeps a criterion in the worksheet but removes its effect from the result. Equal totals share the same rank, and the original option order is preserved inside a tie.
Worked example
Suppose cost has weight 5, reliability 3, and delivery speed 2. Option A scores 8, 6, and 7, producing (40 + 18 + 14) ÷ 10 = 7.2. Option B scores 6, 9, and 8, producing (30 + 27 + 16) ÷ 10 = 7.3. Option B ranks first, but the narrow gap tells you to inspect the assumptions before treating it as a decisive win.
Better inputs
How to get a useful ranking
01
Define the decision first
Write one decision and one time horizon. Mixing short-term price with long-term strategy without naming the horizon makes the scores hard to interpret.
02
Give the scale anchors
Agree on what 1, 5, and 10 mean for each criterion before scoring. A 10 for cost should represent the same kind of fit across every option.
03
Score before debating the winner
Judge each option against the criterion, then look at the totals. Editing scores only to force a preferred result defeats the audit trail.
04
Test the close calls
Change one uncertain weight or score and recalculate. If the winner flips easily, record the decision as sensitive instead of presenting a false margin of confidence.